I can see that people for book banning want to spare children from reading any racist, sexual or any religious beliefs in books, but I believe it is up to the parents to keep them from books with this kind of content if the choose too. Take television or the internet, they both have content that is not suitable for children and in this situation it is the parents job to set the parental controls. The situation should be the same for books. I am aware that it is not as easy as a click of a button, but come on, how hard is it to take the book away from your child. If worse came to worse and the child read the book anyway, do you really think it is going to change their lives that much? It is a book for God's sake, I have forgotten the content of all the books I read when I was I child. By the time they are in their teens or even younger the will be exposed to the horrors of American society anyways. So, why not get them ready for it. The topics that cause banning are not of anything to make a fuss about anyways, such as, certain words or messages.
Take Harry Potter for an example, it is completely ridiculous that people believe that a story for children that mention witches and spells is considered evil and that children will not be able to distinguish between good and evil. It it obvious that the only people who believe this are religious freaks. Why cant people just see it as fantasy and ignore it so children can enjoy it. If we ban Harry Potter books because of this reason, then we might as well ban witch costumes to be worn by children on Halloween. Where does it end?
1 comment:
I doubt that the figure in Monet's painting was either African or American, but it's an interesting analogy.
Do you really not remember any books you read as a child? Did none of them have any effect on your life?
Post a Comment